Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Burgess
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided December 21, 1956No. 15596PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WHITTAKER, Circuit Judge.
The Secretary of Labor sought to enjoin the operators of the Coy Delinting Co. of Coy, Arkansas (who proved to be only, appellees, Compton and Coggins), from failing to comply with the minimum wage provisions of Section 6, Section 206, Title 29, U.S.C.A., and with the record keeping provisions of Section 11 (c), Section 211(c), Title 29, U.S.C.A., and with the shipment provisions of Section 15(a) (1), Section 215(a) (1), Title 29, U.S.C.A., of the Fair Labor Standards Act.
The District Court, upon a trial without a jury, found that appellees, Compton and Coggins, were…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Maneja v. Waialua Agricultural Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Abram v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1942
- Abram v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1943
- Heaburg v. Independent Oil Mill, Inc.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1942
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wirtz v. Burton Mercantile & Gin Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1963
- Oglala Sioux Tribe v. Van HunnikDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2015
- Mitchell v. BurgessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1956