Legal Opinion

Abram v. San Joaquin Cotton Oil Co.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided March 5, 1943No. 2032PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. F. T. O’CONNOR, District Judge.

This is an action to recover unpaid overtime compensation, an additional amount as liquidated damages, and attorney fees, pursuant to 29 U.S.C.A. § 216(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act, hereinafter referred to as the Act.

Inasmuch as the principal questions are of first impression, determination thereof must be accomplished without the aid of judicial precedent. The processing of cotton seed is an important industry in California and in many other states. The laborers employed and the owners and operators of plants engaged in the processing of cotton seed…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Hawaii v. MankichiSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Maneja v. Waialua Agricultural Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Wright v. United States Rubber Co.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1946
  3. Joseph v. RayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943
  4. Waialua Agr. Co. v. ManejaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1951
  5. Association for Retarded Citizens in Colorado v. FrazierDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API