Legal Opinion

Michael Shane Bargo, Jr. v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 29, 2017No. SC14-125PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Michael Shane Bargo, Jr., appeals his first-degree murder conviction and sentence of death for the killing of Seath Jackson. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed below, we affirm Bargo’s conviction but vacate the death sentence • and remand for a’ new penalty phase based on the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Hurst v. Florida (Hurst v. Florida), — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 616, 193 L.Ed.2d 504 (2016), and this Court’s opinion on remand in Hurst v. State (Hurst), 202 So.3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, No. 16-998, — U.S. —, 137 S.Ct. 2161, 198…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ring v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Hurst v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Timothy Lee Hurst v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2016
  4. Spencer v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  5. Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2001

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eriese Alphonso Tisdale v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  2. Eriese Alphonso Tisdale v. State of Florida – Corrected OpinionSupreme Court of Florida · 2018
  3. Michael Shane Bargo v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API