Legal Opinion

United States v. Marolf

District Court, C.D. California

Decided July 11, 1997No. SA CV 96-1185 AHSPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RETURN OF SEIZED PROPERTY

STOTLER, District Judge.

I

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

Defendant was arrested on September 16, 1991, and, on March 23, 1992, entered a guilty plea to one count of conspiracy to import approximately 900 kilograms of marijuana into the United States in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 963 (Count One of the First Superseding Information). The agreement preserved his right to appeal any adverse determination of his motions to suppress certain evidence. The Court denied defendant’s motions, and the Court of Appeals affirmed this decision on June 30, 1993.…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Peralta v. Heights Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred & Fifty DollarsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. MarolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Clymore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. $57,960.00 in United States CurrencyDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1999
  4. United States v. MulliganDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1998
  5. United States v. DusenberyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API