Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Duncan

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 13, 2013No. 450PA12PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEWBY, Justice.

Today we clarify the effect of an unresolved request for attorney’s fees on an appeal from an order that otherwise fully determines the action. Once the trial court enters an order that decides all substantive claims, the right to appeal commences. Failure to appeal from that order forfeits the right. Because attorney’s fees and costs are collateral to a final judgment on the merits, an unresolved request for attorney’s fees and costs does not render interlocutory an appeal from the trial court’s order. Accordingly, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals.

After filing…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Veazey v. City of DurhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Bumpers v. COMMUNITY BANK OF N. VIRGINIASupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  4. Duncan v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. In re: CranorCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  2. Thompson v. Town of White LakeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  3. Radiator Specialty Co. v. Arrowood Indem. Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  4. Salvie v. Medical Center Pharmacy of Concord, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  5. Sanders v. State Personnel CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API