Estate of Apple Ex Rel. Apple v. Commercial Courier Express, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUNTER, Judge.
The Estate of Worth Apple (“plaintiff’) appeals an Opinion and Award of the Full Commission of the North Carolina Industrial Commission filed 13 February 2003 ruling that Commercial Courier Express, Inc. (“CCE”) and Michigan Mutual Insurance Company (collectively “defendants”) were not responsible for additional payments for rehabilitation care of Worth Apple (“Apple”). Because we conclude plaintiff lacks standing to bring this claim, we must vacate that portion of the Commission’s Opinion and Award.
This case stems from the same facts as Apple v. Commercial Courier Express,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Neuse River Foundation, Inc. v. Smithfield Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Palmer v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
- Estate of Apple Ex Rel. Apple v. Commercial Courier Express, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
3Cited by4 opinions
- Estate of Apple Ex Rel. Apple v. Commercial Courier Express, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Estate of Apple Ex Rel. Apple v. Commercial Courier Express, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
- Estate of Apple Ex Rel. Apple v. Commercial Courier Express, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Estate of Apple Ex Rel. Apple v. Commercial Courier Express, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005