Estate of Apple Ex Rel. Apple v. Commercial Courier Express, Inc.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HUNTER, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals an Opinion and Award of the Full Commission of the North Carolina Industrial Commission filed 13 February 2003 ruling that Commercial Courier Express, Inc. (“CCE”) and Michigan Mutual Insurance Company (collectively “defendants”) were not responsible for additional payments for rehabilitation care of Worth Apple (“Apple”). Because we conclude plaintiff lacks standing to bring this claim, we must vacate that portion of the Commission’s Opinion and Award.
This case stems from the same facts as Estate of Apple v. Commercial Courier Express, Inc., 165 N.C. App. 530,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Hyler v. GTE Products Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
- Neuse River Foundation, Inc. v. Smithfield Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Taylor v. J. P. Stevens Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- Pearson v. C.P. Buckner Steel Erection Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Munger v. StateCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Peninsula Property Owners Association, Inc. v. Crescent ResourcesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Woodring v. SwieterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- Marriott v. Chatham CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- Fairfield Harbour Property Owners Ass'n v. Midsouth Golf, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.