Legal Opinion
Walling v. Shenandoah-Dives Mining Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 8, 1943No. 2623PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.
This action was instituted in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado by the administrator of the Wage and Hour Division 'of the United States Department of Labor to enjoin the Shenandoah-Dives Mining Company from violating provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq. The complaint alleged violations of the Act extending over a period of three years. In a supplemental answer, the company alleged that about six months after the institution of the action it entered into a new contract with the bargaining…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- United States v. Trans-Missouri Freight Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1897
- California v. San Pablo & Tulare RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- United States v. Alaska Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1919
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Walling v. Fairmont Creamery Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Jose R. E. Martinez v. Elliot L. Richardson, Individually and as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- Morris v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Chicago Great Western Ry. Co. v. BeecherCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1945
- Mitchell v. HertzkeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.