Legal Opinion

Rahilly v. O'Laughlin

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 23, 1924No. 6531PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENYON, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff in error brought action in the United States District Court of North Dakota, Southeastern Division, in December, 1922, against Michael O’Laughlin, on 14 promissory notes given by said O’Laughlin to him, dated September 30, 1896, in the sum of $1,000 each, and due one year after date. The defendant in said action, Michael O’Langhlin, who since said trial is deceased, in defense to the same claimed that the statute of limitations had run, and that in any event the debt had been wiped out by a proceeding in bankruptcy in the year 1902, wherein defendant was…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Board of Com'rs of Woodson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  3. Wetzell v. BussardSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  4. Clementson v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1814
  5. Fort Scott v. HickmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Moore v. SniderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Noel C. Irvine v. Frank T. GradovilleCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API