Legal Opinion

State v. Harris

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 26, 1975No. 7515SC5PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLARK, Judge.

After the jury had been empaneled but before any evidence had been introduced, the defendants made a motion to suppress all evidence seized at the Northampton Plaza. A voir dire was conducted in the absence of the jury. At the voir dire, Officer Tripp testified and on cross-examination was asked questions relating to the two prior convictions to which the informer’s information had presumably led. These questions were asked with the obvious hope of impeaching the affiant with regard to his statements concerning the previous reliability of the informer. Objections to these…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Giordenello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Satterwhite v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  2. State v. LouchheimCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  3. People v. LawsIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  4. People v. LawsIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API