Legal Opinion
Hamilton v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided September 30, 2003No. 576, 2002PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice:
The proceedings in this Court started as an appeal by Jerome K. Hamilton (“Hamilton”) from the Superior Court’s judgment that summarily denied Hamilton’s motion for post-conviction relief. Hamilton alleged that the Department of Correction had improperly calculated the sentences that had been imposed for several criminal convictions. This Court remanded the matter to the Superior Court for reconsideration and retained jurisdiction. Upon remand, the Superior Court concluded that its original judgment should be vacated and ordered the Department of Correction to recalculate…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Brittingham v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
- Zirn v. VLI Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1996
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
- Gannett Co., Inc. v. KanagaSupreme Court of Delaware · 2000
- Hunter v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- State v. WrightSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
- AT&T Corp. v. LillisSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- 21st Century Assurance Co. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 2015
- AT&T Corp. v. LillisSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.