Legal Opinion
Transamerica Insurance v. Sayble
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 11, 1987No. B022359PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROTH, P. J.
Transamerica Insurance Company and Hill Sayble appeal from the judgments in favor of Home Insurance Company and New England Reinsurance Company after the trial court granted their motions for summary judgment. The issue is whether Home Insurance and New England are required, under their professional liability policies issued to Sayble, to defend law suits based on business conflicts between members of a law firm, without any allegation of professional malpractice. Concluding that the answer is “no,” we affirm.
Hill Sayble is an attorney who worked alone until December 1970.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Parsons v. Bristol Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Leff v. GunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Rosenfeld, Meyer & Susman v. CohenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Sayble v. FeinmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Blumberg v. Guarantee InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Biborosch v. Transamerica InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- ASP Properties Group, L.P. v. Fard, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Kashmiri v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- Barnett v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Lloyd Farr v. Farm Bureau Insurance Company Of NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.