People v. Quinn
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.
By a separate information, each of the defendants was charged with the crime of robbery; also with a prior conviction of a felony. By stipulation of the several interested parties, the two actions were tried simultaneously. Prom a judgment of conviction, as well as from an order by which his motion for a new trial was denied, each of the defendants has appealed to this court.
The details of the story of the commission of the offense for which the defendants were placed on trial do not materially differ from those attending any other robbery of recent years in this vicinity. It is only in the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- People v. WintersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. Mar Gin SuieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. Un DongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- People v. HamblinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. BassettIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. KaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- People v. OrloffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- People v. LewisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- People v. EdwardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.