People v. Orloff
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BISHOP, J. pro tem.—
Each of the defendants was found guilty, by a jury, of robbery in the first degree, and each has appealed from the order denying him a new trial and from the judgment of conviction. If we remove from the scales that evidence on the People’s side which is there through errors, we find the evidence remaining, as to the three defendants other than Alvarez, so evenly balanced that the errors appear prejudicial, necessitating, as to them, a reversal of the judgment and of the order denying them a new trial, and as to Alvarez we find a total lack of evidence.
The evidence…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. JackskionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- People v. SansomeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- People v. QuinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
- People v. SofferCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- People v. EdelbacherCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- People v. HoganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- People v. KendrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- People v. GorgolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- State v. BallSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.