Legal Opinion

Pfister v. Shusta

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 27, 1994No. 4-93-0070PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cook

Plaintiff, Sean Pfister, brought this action for an injury he suffered while he and defendant, Terry Shusta, were kicking an aluminum can in a college dormitory lobby. The trial court granted summary judgment for defendant, ruling plaintiff’s complaint failed to state a negligence cause of action. The trial court held the can-kicking activity was a contact sport and plaintiff was accordingly required to allege and prove wilful and wanton conduct, not mere negligence. We reverse.

Plaintiff and defendant were both students at Illinois State University on February 9, 1990, when they attended a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Marchetti v. KalishOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Nabozny v. BarnhillAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. Gauvin v. ClarkMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  4. Ross v. ClouserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  5. Dotzler v. TuttleNebraska Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pfister v. ShustaIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Karas v. StrevellIllinois Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Auckenthaler v. GrundmeyerNevada Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Savino v. RobertsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1995
  5. Karas v. StrevellAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API