Legal Opinion

McMichael v. Burnett

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 7, 1933No. 30,864PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*655The opinion of the court was delivered by

Sloan, J.:

This action was one to recover for a breach of a partnership relation. The trial court sustained a motion for a judgment on the pleadings, from which the plaintiff appeals.

The petition contained two causes of action. It is alleged that on or about November 4, 1929, the parties entered into an oral contract whereby it was agreed that they would jointly and as partners trade for a building and its contents located at Cunningham, known as the Cannon Ball garage, which was then owned by O. A. Meng, who was conducting a garage business in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Snehoda v. First National Bank in WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
  2. Deter v. JacksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Dryfoos v. CullinanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  4. Madden v. Cheshire Provident InstitutionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Crutsinger v. HessDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1976
  2. Stimec v. VerderberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1940
  3. Bridges v. BentleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  4. Kaw Valley State Bank v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance v. NevittSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API