Legal Opinion

Dryfoos v. Cullinan

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1877PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Davis District Court. Action by Cullinan, as administrator, against Dryfoos and three others, on an administrator’s bond given by Dryfoos as principal, and his co-defendants as sureties.' The plaintiff claimed $1,415, and interest thereon.

Read the full summary

Error from Davis District Court. Action by Cullinan, as administrator, against Dryfoos and three others, on an administrator’s bond given by Dryfoos as principal, and his co-defendants as sureties.' The plaintiff claimed $1,415, and interest thereon. Dryfoos answered separately, first, “that said John Sanderson, deceased, left no personal property at the time of his death belonging to his estate, nor since that time has any personal property belonging thereto come to the hands or knowledge of defendant; while all sales of real property of said estate, which at any time have been made were…

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

This was an action brought by Cullinan in the court below, as administrator de bonis non of the estate of John Sanderson deceased, against Dryfoos and others on the official bond of said Dryfoos, as administrator of said estate, to recover moneys received by Dryfoos as such administrator. The petition charged that Dryfoos was guilty of waste and unfaithful administration. Dryfoos was appointed administrator August 17th 1870, and his letters of administration were revoked by the probate court August 1st 1874. Cullinan was thereupon…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sumner v. ReichenikerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bessman v. BessmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Vincent v. WernerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  3. McMichael v. BurnettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. Simmons v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API