Legal Opinion

Phoenix Mutual Life Insurance v. Nevitt

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 7, 1938No. 33,841PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action on a promissory note and to foreclose a mortgage securing it. Judgment was entered for plaintiff on a judgment on the note had in an action in another county. The trial court refused to foreclose the mortgage. The plaintiff appeals from that portion of the judgment refusing to foreclose the mortgage. Certain intervenors also appeal from a portion of the judgment affecting them.

There is no dispute about many of the essential facts.

*773This action was filed December 4, 1934. The petition alleged the making of the note in question…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Grossenbacher v. SpringSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  2. Coleman v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  3. Fletcher v. KelloggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1928
  4. Kaw Valley State Bank v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  5. Union Central Life Insurance v. CarraSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Windscheffel v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  2. Kearny County Bank v. NunnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  3. Coleman v. ShoemakerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1938
  4. Mydland v. MydlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  5. Hotchkiss v. OgleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API