Legal Opinion

State v. Roth

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 2003No. 27178PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUTIERREZ, Judge.

Jason T. Roth appeals from his judgment of conviction for driving under the influence, I.C. §§ 18-8004(l)(a) and 18-8004C. Roth argues that the state failed to meet its burden to show the corpus delicti of a driving under the influence offense (DUI) independently from its use of Roth’s extrajudicial admissions, and that the evidence was insufficient to support a DUI conviction. We affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On January 15, 2000, at approximately 1:50 p.m., Blaine County Sheriff’s Officer Curtis A. Miller received a telephone call from dispatcher Dana Hillman…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Opper v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. State v. ZichkoIdaho Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. DeckerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. State v. KnutsonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1991

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. State v. RochaIdaho Supreme Court · 2014
  3. State of Idaho v. Nicholas Stacey WebbIdaho Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. State v. Alfredo Lopez RochaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
  5. State v. DavisIdaho Court of Appeals · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API