Legal Opinion
Sirota v. Kloogman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 9, 1988PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
As a defense to the plaintiffs’ medical malpractice action, the defendant asserted that the court lacked personal jurisdiction over him because of improper service of process. A hearing was held to determine whether the defendant was properly served. The hearing court found the service of January 23, 1986 to have been improper and at the same time recognized that the hearing was academic inasmuch as the plaintiffs had arranged to have the defendant re-served prior to the commencement of the hearing.
Following the hearing, the defendant nevertheless entered judgment with the court clerk…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Shaw v. ShawAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Matter of HoldenNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Helfand v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Dashew v. CantorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Heusinger v. RussoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by8 opinions
- Boorman v. DeutschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Curcio v. J.P Hogan Coring & Sawing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Bank of America, National Ass'n v. ValentinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Putnam County National Bank of Carmel v. SimpsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- IBJ Schroder Bank & Trust Co. v. ZaitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.