Legal Opinion

United States v. John Doe

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 23, 1995No. 342, Docket 92-1438PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KEARSE, Circuit Judge:

Defendant John Doe, 17 years old at the time of his arraignment on the present charges, appeals from an order of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, Carol Bagley Amon, Judge, granting the government’s motion under the Juvenile Delinquency Act, 18 U.S.C. §§ 5081-5042 (1988) (“JDA” or the “Act”), to proceed against him as an adult. The Act. governs federal prosecutions of “juveniles,” defined, insofar as is pertinent here, as persons who have not yet attained the age of 18 years, see id. § 5031. With certain exceptions that are not…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Sessions v. DimayaSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
  2. United States v. Gregory M. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  3. United States v. Juvenile Male 1Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Sylvestre Acosta, Also Known as Sly Acosta, and Paul Skinner, Gerald T. SkinnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. Impounded (Juvenile R.G., Appellant)Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API