Legal Opinion

Impounded (Juvenile R.G., Appellant)

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 30, 1997No. 96-7781PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

BECKER

This appeal by a juvenile defendant charged with a number of serious crimes challenges the authority of the United States gov*365ernment to prosecute him in federal court. The governing statute is 18 U.S.C. § 5032, which establishes a two-step procedure governing the transfer of juveniles from state to federal court for criminal prosecution. The appeal presents the important question, which has divided the circuits, whether the certification decision of the United States Attorney General or her designee — the first-step in the transfer proceedings — is reviewable by a…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Gutierrez De Martinez v. LamagnoSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. A.R., a Male Juvenile, A.R.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Aubrey JoshuaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Zuliken S. Royce v. John E. Hahn, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
  2. United States v. Derrick Jarrett, Lawrence McCarroll Jeffrey Brock, Jamie J. Key, Dwight Anderson, Samir Hameen, and Judy McCarrollCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  3. Victor M. Roussos v. Frederick Menifee, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. Juvenile No. 1Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  5. In Re: Sealed CaseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API