Black v. Louisiana Cent. Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the CourtO’Niell, C. J.
This is a suit for compensation under tlie Employers’ Liability Act, being the Act 20 of 1914, as amended by Act 243 of 1916, Act 38 of 1918, Act 247 of 1920, and Act 43 of 1922. The Act 216 of 1924, which is the latest amendment of the statute, is not applicable, because the cause of action arose before this amendment went into effect.. The plaintiff was employed as conductor on a logging train of the defendant lumber company, and, while he was engaged in roupling cars, his right hand was caught between the drawheads and injured. The in jury disabled him for work of any reasonable character…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Boyer v. Crescent Paper Box Factory, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- Norwood v. Lake Bisteneau Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1918
- Daniels v. Shreveport Producing & Refining Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
- Mack v. LegeaiSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1919
- O'Donnell v. Fortuna Oil Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1925
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Knispel v. Gulf States Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1932
- Stieffel v. Valentine Sugars, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
- Morgan v. American Bitumuls Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1950
- Calhoon v. Meridian Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
- Gulotta v. CutshawSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1973
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.