Legal Opinion
Allingham v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided May 15, 1995PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RODGERS, Senior Judge.
Robert C. Allingham (Claimant) petitions for review of an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) that affirmed a referee’s decision denying benefits to Claimant. We affirm.
Claimant worked as a fire fighter for the City of Pittsburgh (Employer) beginning in July, 1964, and rose to the position of captain. In 1973, Claimant suffered a myocardial infarction. After undergoing successful coronary by-pass surgery, Claimant resumed his duties full time until November, 1989. He had begun to experience fatigue while working and sought treatment from the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Haas v. KasnotSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Hebden v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Ferne, Admrx. v. ChaddertonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Bentivoglio v. RalstonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Marriott Corp. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Bristol Borough v. Workers' Comp. Appeal Bd.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Mulberry Market, Inc. v. City of Philadelphia, Board of License & Inspection ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Bonegre v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- City of Philadelphia v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.