Legal Opinion

Xerox Corp. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided September 19, 2005No. 2005-1076Published

1Opinion of the Court

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 05-1076 XEROX CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. John M. Peterson, Neville Peterson LLP, of New York, New York, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief was Maria E. Celis. Amy M. Rubin, Attorney, International Trade Field Office, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, of New York, New York, argued for defendant-appelee. With her on the brief were Peter D. Keisler, Assistant Attorney General; David M. Cohen, Director, of Washington, DC; and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bell v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Shinyei Corporation of America v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
  3. Mitsubishi Electronics America, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
  4. Goodman Manufacturing, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
  5. United States Shoe Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API