Stoker v. Commonwealth
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CAPERTON, Judge.
Ronald Loren Stoker appeals the denial of his pro se CR 60.02 motion by the Hardin Cireuit Court, which was his see-ond post-conviction motion. Stoker argues that the trial court erred in denying his request for an evidentiary hearing and that this abuse of discretion by the trial court amounts to substantial error under RCr 10.26. Finding no error by the trial court, we affirm.
Stoker was convicted by a jury of three counts of First-Degree Rape (50 years each), three counts of First-Degree Sodomy (80 years each), three counts of First-Degree Sexual Abuse (5 years each),…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Commonwealth v. EnglishKentucky Supreme Court · 1999
- Gross v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1983
- McQueen v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
- Brown v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1996
- Bowling v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Foley v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
- Alan Hummel v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022
- Allan C. Widdefield v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2024
- Andre Shephard v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2023
- Andreius Wimzie v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.