Legal Opinion
Latimore Township v. Latimore Township Zoning Hearing Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided January 4, 2013PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge COLINS.
This is an appeal by Latimore Township (Township) from an order of the Adams County Court of Common Pleas affirming a decision of the Latimore Township Zoning Hearing Board (ZHB) that chicken houses owned by intervenors Dale R. King and Kay L. King (Property Owners) are a permitted use in the zoning district in which they are located. We affirm.
This matter arises out of notices of revocation of nonconforming use issued by the Township with respect to two contiguous parcels of land in the Township (the Property). Property Owners have owned the Property and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Heck v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- City of Hope v. Sadsbury Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Pocono Manor Investors, LP v. Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Smith v. ZONING BD. OF HUNTINGDONCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- Anter Assocs. v. Zoning Hr'g Bd. of ConcordCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kohl v. New Sewickley Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Gorsline v. Bd. of Supervisors of Fairfield Twp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Markwest Liberty Midstream & Resources, LLC v. Cecil Township Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- I. Shvekh v. The ZHB of Stroud Twp. and Twp. of StroudCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- G.A. Reihner and J.A. Reihner v. The City of Scranton ZHBCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.