Legal Opinion
Goodloe v. Bookout
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided February 17, 1999No. 19267PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTZ, Judge.
{1} Plaintiffs appeal an adverse verdict in their personal injury action. They contend that the judgment must be reversed because (1) the district court refused to permit them to recall a witness during their case in chief, (2) the district court improperly restricted cross-examination by permitting only one Plaintiff to cross-examine witnesses regarding liability, and (3) members of the jury improperly discussed the case with one another during the course of trial. We affirm. With respect to issues one and three, Plaintiffs have failed to show prejudice. As for the second…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. Richard O. BertoliCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Oscar H. KleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. ReskoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- State v. NewsomeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sandoval v. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- Kilgore v. FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2009
- Kilgore v. FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- Freeman v. FairchildNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
- Freeman v. FairchildNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.