Legal Opinion
Freeman v. Fairchild
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided December 19, 2014No. 34,929; Docket No. 32,542PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FRY, Judge.
The Opinion filed on July 30, 2014 is withdrawn, and the following is substituted for it. Defendants’ motion for rehearing is denied.
Plaintiffs Jerald W. Freeman, The Tea Leaf, Inc., and Thomas Nygard, Inc., owned a painting that they agreed to sell to Paul Benisek. Benisek, in turn, agreed tp sell the painting to Defendants R.H. Love Galleries, Inc., and Richard H. Love (collectively referred to as Love). Love then sold the painting to Defendant Paul W. Fairchild, Jr. Fairchild paid Love in full for the painting, but Love never completely paid Benisek, and Benisek never…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Avery v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
- Self v. United Parcel Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
- Romero v. Philip Morris Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
- Rivera v. American General Financial Services, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
- Santa Fe Technologies, Inc. v. Argus Networks, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Freeman v. FairchildNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014