Legal Opinion

Kilgore v. FUJI HEAVY INDUSTRIES LTD.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 2010No. 31,750PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAES, Justice.

{1} In this appeal, we reconsider and clarify the “presumption of prejudice” that attaches to extraneous juror communications. After reviewing New Mexico case law in light of United States Supreme Court precedent, we conclude that the party moving for a new trial based on extraneous juror communications bears the burden to prove that (1) material extraneous to the trial actually reached the jury, (2) the extraneous material relates to the case being tried, and (3) it is reasonably probable that the extraneous material affected the jury’s verdict or a typical juror. We…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Smith v. PhillipsSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Remmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  4. Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. State v. HarrisSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Lee Samuel ChristensenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2019
  2. American Power Products, Inc. v. CSK Auto, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. LymonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Charter Bank v. FrancoeurNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. American Power Products, Inc. v. CSK Auto, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API