Legal Opinion

Johnson v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 10, 2012No. 84PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAdkins, J.

In this case, we consider the remedies available to a defendant 16 years after his conviction and sentence for a crime not charged in the indictment. Following his arrest in 1992, Petitioner Jarmal Johnson was convicted of assault with intent to murder and other crimes, even though the indictment returned by the Grand Jury did not charge assault with intent to murder. Petitioner did not raise this issue at trial, at sentencing, or on direct appeal. Not until 16 years after his conviction did Petitioner file a motion to correct an illegal sentence, claiming that the trial court lacked the…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. De Jonge v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Walczak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  4. Randall Book Corp. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  5. Chaney v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. Raymond Edward BraunCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2015
  2. Bailey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  3. Carlini v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Shannon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  5. Rainey v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2018

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API