Legal Opinion

People v. Knupp

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 31, 1992PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Where it is probative, expert evidence concerning rape trauma syndrome and child sexual abuse syndrome is admissible in a criminal case to aid the jury in understanding certain phenomena beyond the common ken (see, People v Taylor, 75 NY2d 277; People v Keindl, 68 NY2d 410, rearg denied 69 NY2d 823; People v Gallow, 171 AD2d 1061, lv denied 77 NY2d 995; People v Karst, 166 AD2d 920, lv denied 76 NY2d 987; People v Page, 166 AD2d 886, lv denied 77 NY2d 842; People v Wellman, 166 AD2d 302, lv denied 78 NY2d 958; see also, People v Cintron, 75 NY2d 249; Matter of Nicole V., 71 NY2d 112). In…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In re Nicole V.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. KeindlNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Chattergoon v. New York City Housing AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. People v. CintronNew York Court of Appeals · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. MercadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. People v. HryckewiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  3. People v. DeLongAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  4. People v. SinghAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. People v. BurtonNew York Supreme Court · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API