People v. Young
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BARRY-DEAL, J.
On appeal from a sentence of ten years and eight months imprisonment, appellant Michael Young contends that the trial court erred in using a 1974 prison term to enhance his sentence, because he had been free of custody for over five years. He also argues that imposition of an enhancement in this case thwarted the legislative intent underlying Penal Code section 667.5, subdivision (b), 1 and that enhancements could not properly be imposed in this case because he was not fully advised of the effect of failing to contest the validity of his prior felony convictions. We…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. BelleciCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. AstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- County of San Diego v. MunizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- People v. WilliamsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. TennerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
- People v. FielderCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- McAlpine v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
- In Re PrestonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.