Legal Opinion

National Grange Mutual Insurance v. Smith

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 24, 1990No. 89-212PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSouter, J.

In these cross appeals from an order of the Superior Court (Hollman, J.) on cross petitions for declaratory judgment, an uninsured motorist carrier excepts to an award of interest from the date of the writ in an underlying tort action that had resulted in a verdict held to bind both insurer and insured, and the insured excepts to the ruling that it was so bound. We reverse as to interest but affirm that the underlying verdict bound the insured.

*280Following the death of Lisa Noeding by asphyxiation in an auto, her administratrix brought action against the car’s operator and the owner of a garage…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Daigle v. City of PortsmouthSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  2. Trombly v. Blue Cross/Blue ShieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  3. Hackman v. American Mutual Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  4. Paddock v. DurhamSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1970
  5. Hayes v. HansonSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1841

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Katherine M. CHAMBERLIN, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. 101 REALTY, INC., Et Al., Defendants, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  2. Coakley v. Maine Bonding & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
  3. Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance v. RalphSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  4. Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance v. RalphSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994
  5. Metropolitan Property & Liability Insurance v. RalphSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API