Legal Opinion

State v. Rehling

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 19, 1988No. Cr. 880014PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.

Marvin Rehling appeals from a judgment of conviction entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of two counts of delivery of a controlled substance. We affirm.

On two separate occasions Rehling sold marijuana to a police informant. He was subsequently arrested and charged with delivery of a controlled substance in violation of Section 19-03.1-23, N.D.C.C. At trial Rehling did not dispute that he had sold marijuana to the informant, but he raised an entrapment defense based upon his allegation that he was afraid of the informant and that the informant had threatened…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. MankeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. RicehillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. SlapnickaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. PfisterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  5. State v. BrownNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. City of Bismarck v. NassifNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. KummerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. MichlitschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
  4. State v. HolteNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. OverbyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API