Legal Opinion
Graham v. Perez
New York Supreme Court
Decided February 28, 1996Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
David Goldstein, J.
Defendant moves to vacate as untimely, plaintiff’s notice of *623claim, which had been served upon the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corporation (MVAIC). Plaintiff cross-moves to compel MVAIC to assume the defense of both Perez and Washington, the owner and operator, respectively, of the vehicle in which plaintiff had been riding at the time of the accident. The accident occurred on July 30, 1993, when the vehicle in which plaintiff had been a passenger was struck by a vehicle operated by codefendant Bell.
Thereafter, Interboro Mutual Indemnity…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re the Arbitration Between Lloyd & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- In re the Arbitration between Kauffman & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- In re the Arbitration between Chiro & Merchants Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- In re the Arbitration between the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & CosulichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1965
- In re the Arbitration between Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1961
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.