Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between Kauffman & Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 18, 1966PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment entered after trial before the court without a jury, based upon a finding that timely written notice was given respondent-appellant MVAIC, unanimously reversed, on the law, the facts and in the exercise of discretion, and the motion to stay arbitration permanently is granted, with $50 costs to respondent-appellant. On April 14, 1964 claimant was injured when the car he was operating was struck by another automobile which was uninsured. Claimant’s car was insured, and as a named insured he was entitled to make claim against respondent MVAIC, under the provisions of the New York…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. RomeroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Eveready Insurance v. ChavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  3. State Farm Mutual Insurance v. PizzoniaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Acevedo v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  5. In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & FrankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API