Legal Opinion

In re the Arbitration between the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & Cosulich

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 4, 1965PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment entered May 6, 1964, finding that timely written notice was given to the MVAIC, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, with $50 costs to appellant; judgment directed in favor of MVAIC and the application to stay arbitration granted. A trial by jury was ordered on the issue as to whether timely written notice was given to MVAIC, upon the -application by MVAIC to stay an -arbitration demanded by the claimant. After a trial, the jury found that timely notice had been given. Under the MVAIC endorsement, written notice of intention to make a claim must be filed with MVAIC “…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. RomeroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Losi v. Hanover InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  3. Acevedo v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  4. In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & FrankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
  5. Mercer v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API