In re the Arbitration between the Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. & Cosulich
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment entered May 6, 1964, finding that timely written notice was given to the MVAIC, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, with $50 costs to appellant; judgment directed in favor of MVAIC and the application to stay arbitration granted. A trial by jury was ordered on the issue as to whether timely written notice was given to MVAIC, upon the -application by MVAIC to stay an -arbitration demanded by the claimant. After a trial, the jury found that timely notice had been given. Under the MVAIC endorsement, written notice of intention to make a claim must be filed with MVAIC “…
2Cited by7 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. RomeroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Losi v. Hanover InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Acevedo v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- In re the Arbitration between Allstate Insurance & FrankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Mercer v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.