Legal Opinion

Chippewa Indians v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 14, 1935No. H-76PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, Judge

The plaintiffs in this case bring suit for a sum not specified in the petition, but if substantially all their claims are sustained they would be entitled to a judgment of several millions of dollars. Both the defendant and the intervenor, the Bed Lake Band of Chippewa Indians, contravene the allegations of the petition and the defendant sets up some other defenses which, in our view of the case, it is not necessary to consider. The case comes here under a congressional reference. The terms of the statute referring it, so far as material to the determination of the case, are fully set out in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Worcester v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  2. United States v. KagamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. United States v. WinansSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  4. Jones v. MeehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  5. Minnesota v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
  2. Red Lake Band v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  3. Red Lake Band v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  4. Red Lake Band v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
  5. Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API