Minnesota Chippewa Tribe v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
These three cases, which were transferred to this court by the Indian Claims Commission, are presently before the court for decision on the defendant’s pleas that the causes of action are barred by the doctrine of res judicata. Two of the cases came to us on requests for review of opinions by Trial Judge Schwartz and the third arises on a motion to dismiss filed by defendant. By order of the court, these cases were consolidated for purposes of review and consideration and they were orally argued together.
Nos. 19 and 189-A
(Consolidated)
The question presented in these consolidated cases is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Lone Wolf v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Chippewa Indians of Minn. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Container Transport International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- United States v. Sioux Nation of IndiansUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- White Mountain Apache Tribe of Arizona v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1982
- The Minnesota Chippewa Tribe (No. 19) Red Lake Band, (No. 189-A) and Minnesota Chippewa Tribe (No. 188) v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Red Lake Band v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
- Sioux Tribe of Indians v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.