Hodges v. Truax
Indiana Court of Appeals
From the Madison Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWiley, J.
— Appellee sued appellant upon a promissory note dated June 25th, 1892, due six months from date, with seven per cent, interest, the face value of the note being $293.07. Appellant answered in four paragraphs as follows: (1) General denial; (2) Payment; (3) Accord and satisfaction, in which it was averred that the note in suit was given for certain goods and merchandise purchased by appellant from appellee, and for which appellee charged him “exorbitant, excessive, and unreasonable” prices, and more than he could have purchased said goods elsewhere; that appellant did not discover this fact…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Fuller v. . KempNew York Court of Appeals · 1893
- Nassoiy v. . TomlinsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
- Bull v. BullSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1876
- Duluth Chamber of Commerce v. KnowltonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
- Fensler v. PratherIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Michael v. HollandIndiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Sanditen v. Allied Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
- Meyer v. GreenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898
- American Seeding Machine Co. v. BakerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
- Jennings v. DurflingerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1900
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.