Legal Opinion

Jennings v. Durflinger

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 12, 1900No. 2,931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Erom the Henry Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Henley, J. —

This action was commenced by appellee against appellants by a complaint in one paragraph, being *674a common count for goods sold. Appellants answered in four paragraphs. The cause was submitted to the court for trial without the intervention of a jury, and the court, by request of plaintiff, made a special finding of facts, and stated its conclusions of law thereon. The only question in this case is whether or not the special finding of facts does or does not show an accord and satisfaction of the claim sued on.

The special finding of facts, which presents the whole question in this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hancock v. YadenIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Stone v. LewmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  3. Pottlitzer v. WessonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  4. Henes v. HenesIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Hodges v. TruaxIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sherman v. Pacific Coast Pipe Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Sanditen v. Allied Refining Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Neubacher v. PerryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914
  4. Sunderman v. SundermanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945
  5. Neher v. KerrIndiana Court of Appeals · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API