Legal Opinion

Wolfe v. Wallingford Bank & Trust Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 12, 1938PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Under the substituted complaint as amended and as tried, this case was one at law for damages for breach of the oral agreement alleged for the conveyance of land. Upon a previous appeal, reported in 122 Conn. 507, 191 Atl. 88, we held that the trial court erred in recognizing in this action at law the purely equitable doctrine of part performance to take the contract out of the Statute of Frauds, set aside the judgment for the plaintiffs, and remanded the case for further proceedings. The plaintiffs thereupon amended their complaint by adding allegations that the defendant is estopped to…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. ColgroveSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Seymour v. OelrichsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Glass v. HulbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
  4. Insurance Co. v. MowrySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  5. Woolley v. . StewartNew York Court of Appeals · 1918

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Anderson v. WhippleIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Glazer v. Dress Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. Ubysz v. DiPietroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  4. DeLuca v. C. W. Blakeslee & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  5. Miller v. LawlorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API