Legal Opinion

Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. Cox

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 13, 1960No. 38055PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bell, Judge.

For a claimant to be entitled to compensation under Code (Ann.) § 114-102 of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, the party must show that the employee’s death resulted from an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. However, the accident cannot be a wilful act of a third person directed against the employee for reasons personal to such employee. The terms “arising out of” and “in the course *792of” are not synonymous. The latter term refers to time, place, and circumstances under which the accident took place, while an accident “arises out of employment” when it is…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SumrellCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  2. Ladson Motor Company v. CroftSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  3. Standard Accident Insurance v. KikerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932
  4. Pinkerton National Detective Agency v. WalkerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
  5. EMPLOYERS INSURANCE COMPANY OF ALABAMA v. BassCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Tredway v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. American Hardware Mutual Insurance v. BurtCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Buschel v. Kysor/WarrenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1994
  4. General Accident Fire & Life Insurance v. SturgisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  5. Barge v. City of College ParkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API