Legal Opinion

Allen v. Woodfield Chevrolet, Inc.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 2003No. 94814PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fitzgerald

At issue in this appeal is whether certain amendments to the Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (Act) (815 ILCS 505/1 et seq. (West 1996)), which govern consumer fraud claims against new or used vehicle dealers, violate the Illinois constitutional prohibition against special legislation. See Ill. Const. 1970, art. JY, § 13. The trial court found no constitutional infirmity; the appellate court reversed. 332 Ill. App. 3d 605. We hold that the statutory amendments constitute impermissible special legislation and therefore affirm the appellate court judgment invalidating these…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Best v. Taylor MacHine WorksIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Martin v. Heinold Commodities, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Grasse v. Dealer's Transport Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Bernier v. BurrisIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Scott v. Association for Childbirth at Home, InternationalIllinois Supreme Court · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Krautsack v. AndersonIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Arvia v. MadiganIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  3. General Motors Corp. v. State of Illinois Motor Vehicle Review BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Hayashi v. Illinois Department of Financial & Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 2015
  5. In re Equifax, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2019

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API