Legal Opinion

Clark v. BRUMBAUGH AND QUANDAHL, PC, LLO

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided September 29, 2010No. 8:09CV315PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

LYLE E. STROM, Senior Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter is before the Court on plaintiffs summary judgment motion (Filing No. 29). In their opposition briefs, defendants have moved for summary judgment (Filing Nos. 42 and 45).

Plaintiff Mary Clark (“Clark”) filed this action against defendants Capital One Bank, Inc. (“Capital One”) and Brumbaugh & Quandahl, P.C. L.L.O., (“B & Q”) for alleged violations of the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (the “FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692, et seq., and the Nebraska Consumer Protection Act (the “NCPA”), Neb.Rev.Stat. § 59-1601 et seq.…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Johnson v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Simon v. FIA Card Services, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
  2. Pace v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2012
  3. Broadrick v. LVNV Funding LLC (In re Broadrick)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2015
  4. Nicolaides v. Divine & Serv., Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 2019
  5. Davis v. LawDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API