Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Frederick R. Ross Investment Co.

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided December 22, 1988No. 87CA1099PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HARDEMAN, Judge. *

Barbara Kathryn Stuart (plaintiff) appeals the trial court’s dismissal of her complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and the court’s ruling prohibiting her from amending her complaint. We reverse.

Plaintiff’s verified complaint alleged that the individual defendants (except Sebastion) were co-employees of hers and that one or more of them assaulted her during a company retreat held in Vail. To support a claim of vicarious liability against her former employer, Frederick R. Ross Investment Co., plaintiff alleged that each co-employee was acting in the scope of his…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kandt v. EvansSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  2. City of Boulder v. StreebSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  3. Renner v. ChiltonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1960
  4. Francisco v. CASCADE INVESTMENT COMPANYColorado Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. K-R Funds, Inc. v. FoxColorado Court of Appeals · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crochiere v. Board of Education of Town of EnfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  2. In the Matter of A.L.B.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Benson v. Colorado Compensation Insurance AuthorityColorado Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Building & Construction Trades Department v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1991
  5. Cline v. RabsonColorado Court of Appeals · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API