Legal Opinion

Colden v. Botts

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1834PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a caase a certiorari was sued out to remove proceedings had under the statute, 2 R. S, 511, &c. authorizing summary proceedings to obtain the possession of land in certain cases, and a return had been made to the writ, and on motion by the defendant to quash the certiorari, it was held, by the Chief Justice, that a party having no interest in the subject matter of the proceedings was not entitled to prosecute a certiorari, and he accordingly quashed the writ.

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Hammond v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. McFarland v. PierceIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. People v. LeavittMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Metropolitan Dev. Com'n of Marion Co. v. CullisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Stout v. MercerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API