Colden v. Botts
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
In a caase a certiorari was sued out to remove proceedings had under the statute, 2 R. S, 511, &c. authorizing summary proceedings to obtain the possession of land in certain cases, and a return had been made to the writ, and on motion by the defendant to quash the certiorari, it was held, by the Chief Justice, that a party having no interest in the subject matter of the proceedings was not entitled to prosecute a certiorari, and he accordingly quashed the writ.
2Cited by14 opinions
- City of Hammond v. Board of Zoning AppealsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- McFarland v. PierceIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- People v. LeavittMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Metropolitan Dev. Com'n of Marion Co. v. CullisonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1972
- Stout v. MercerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.