Anatra v. ZONING BD. OF APPEALS OF MADISON
Connecticut Appellate Court
1ConcurrenceGruendel, J.
I concur with the well reasoned majority opinion. When a zoning board of appeals elects to enumerate specific conditions in granting a variance, those conditions must be set forth with clarity. I write separately to address the line of precedent relied on by the defendant in this appeal, the zoning board of appeals of the town of Madison, and the trial *140court in the proceeding below, regarding the import of the variance application in ascertaining the scope of a granted variance.
The precedent of our appellate courts instructs that, at times, a review of the variance application is of use in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Couch v. Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Florentine v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Reid v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Wesley v. Schaller Subaru, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Pleasant View Farms Development, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.