Legal Opinion

Ruzicka v. Commissioner of the Department of Employment & Training

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided March 11, 1994No. 92-P-1067PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment entered in the District Court affirming the denial of unemployment benefits to the plaintiff, Jerome E. Ruzicka. On July 2, 1991, the Department of Employment and Training (DET) found Ru-*216zicka to be ineligible within the meaning of G. L. c. 151 A, § 24(a),1 for financial benefits.

The plaintiff worked for Barry Wright Corporation until February 9, 1990, when he was separated from his employment. Upon termination, he received a single, lump sum payment equivalent to six months’ wages, pursuant to an agreement with his employer. In addition, his medical and life…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Merisme v. Board of Appeals on Motor Vehicle Liability Policies & BondsMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  2. School Comm. of Greenfield v. Greenfield Educ. Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Raytheon Co. v. Director of Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1974
  4. Capone v. Zoning Board of Appeals of FitchburgMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  5. Bolta Products Division v. Director of the Division of Employment SecurityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prozinski v. Northeast Real Estate Services, LLCMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2003
  2. White v. Commissioner of the Department of Employment & TrainingMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
  3. Trust Insurance Co. v. Commissioner of the Division of InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API